Nineteen officers face serious criminal charges
Sunday July 30, 2006
By Stephen Cook
Nearly two dozen of
the country's serving police officers are facing serious criminal charges
ranging from rape, indecent assault and wounding with intent - and most are
still on full pay.
The revelations are
another blow for police credibility and come just a fortnight after a female
Auckland police officer was "counselled" for moonlighting as a
prostitute.
The Office of the
Commissioner is playing down the number and seriousness of the charges, saying
cases currently pending against serving officers should be taken in the context
of a 10,000-strong police force.
But former top cop Ian
Holyoake and one of the country's leading QC's Peter Williams disagree. They
say the charges are symptomatic of wider problems within the police.
Details of the 23
criminal charges laid against the 19 serving police officers were released to
the Herald on Sunday under the Official Information Act and include 11
assault charges, three drink-driving charges, one rape and one indecent assault
charge, and one count of wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm.
Some charges carry a
maximum prison sentence of 20 years.
Also included among
the cases are new charges against suspended Assistant Police Commissioner Clint
Rickards relating to alleged sexual offending in the 1980s. Rickards and former
officers Brad Shipton and Bob Schollum were acquitted in March of raping Louise
Nicholas but were charged shortly after with raping a second woman. Rickards
has remained on full pay since inquiries into those matters began two years
ago.
As well as the
criminal charges faced by police, seven serving officers are currently on
serious internal police charges for offences including disgraceful conduct,
inappropriate use of a computer, falsifying a document and using unnecessary
force. This comes after police were heavily criticised last year after an
investigation into pornography on work computers.
Stuart Wildon, a
spokesman for the Office of the Commissioner, would not release specific
details about any of the criminal and internal charges facing police, saying
matters were subjudice, and he had employer obligations to "respect
privacy and employer confidentiality". He also would not release the names
or ranks of the officers involved or what police districts they worked in.
He confirmed, however,
that most police officers facing charges had been suspended on full pay.
"All
circumstances must be taken into account and this, of course, includes the
nature and seriousness of the charge. Most members remain on full pay unless
and until such time that there is good reason to vary the member's pay."
One of those suspended
officers is sole-charge Taranaki constable Jonathan Erwood, who was charged
last week with drink-driving after failing a breath test while attending a
crash that killed two people. However, Erwood is not the only officer facing
drink-drive charges, with two other cases currently before the courts.
Meanwhile, six of the
assault charges faced by officers related to incidents that occurred while they
were on duty, while four involve off-duty incidents - including one case where
a policeman was alleged to have assaulted someone with a weapon, in this case
his dog. One of the officers charged with assault is also facing an additional
charge of perverting the course of justice.
Aside from the charges
against Rickards, the most serious involve an officer accused of raping a woman
and wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and a separate case of a
police officer charged with indecent assault.
Wildon said the police
force was a 10,000-plus organisation, and the cases against serving police
officers related to less than half a per cent of its workforce. He also said
that around 44 officers a year ended up in court on criminal charges, a number
that had remained stable since 1998. "Seen in that light, the numbers are
very small. It is, however, always disappointing to have any of our staff transgress
the criminal or disciplinary code," he said.
However, leading
Auckland QC Peter Williams disagreed, saying that while it was healthy police
were prosecuting their own, the seriousness of the charges was
"surprising" and of major concern. He believed the charges were a
direct reflection of wider issues confronting police and society in general.
"There is a certain element in the police force that needs to be very
tightly controlled."
Retired assistant
police commissioner Ian Holyoake was also concerned at the number of officers
facing charges. During his 30 years in the force, he had not seen police face
such a range of serious charges.
"A policeman on a
criminal charge 10, 20, 30 years ago was just unbelievable," he said.
However, Police
Association president Greg O'Connor said in many cases police were charged over
nothing more than an allegation. Most charges didn't stack up but were pursued,
to avoid creating an impression that police were easier on their own.
"Because of an
absolute fear of being accused of covering up things, police are very quick to
put their officers before the courts. Yes, there are police officers who commit
criminal offences, but it is a small number," O'Connor said.
"One charge is too many, and we all feel it. That's why it is important standards are kept up."